A recent news article on a discovery in geography helps to confirm my views of the Global Model. https://www.nytimes.com/2023/01/23/science/earth-core-reversing-spin.html
The news article concerns a discovery about Earth's core, which theory brings important implications for understanding both physical and moral science. Briefly, and in lay terms, the discovery states that Earth's core both spins, and that the direction of it's spin changes. The direction of the spin of Earth's core changes approximately every 70 years. The finding that the Earth's core's spin changes direction, and that the direction of the spin of the Earth's core changes every 60-70 years are important additions to the theory that the Earth has a core that is spinning.
The scientific finding regarding the Earth's core supports Global Model because it is implicitly a round Earth theory. "Core," "inner core," "outer core," "spinning," etc. speak a Global Model language because the science that supports this theory means spherical and, or round. The theory does not speak to a code. Global Model is validated by a scientific view, and not a moral view. Flat Earth Model, on the other hand, presents a code that is validated as a moral point of view. The Global Model only addresses the language of science.
Science is not only physical science, it is also moral science. The Global Model speaks to moral science as a category of scientific methodology within the categories of science, including geology. The Global Model, more specifically, is a view of health that comes from "round" Earth science. It's morality is modern, not ancient. As a modern scientific view Global Model explains health as a part of modern science. The consequences of the change in direction for the spin of the Earth's core are explained in it's theory as changes in the length of time of the day, and changes in seasons, for example. These findings in environmental science have consequential findings in moral science.
One interesting connection to moral science is a connection from the philosophy of Frederich Nietzsche. In his book, Beyond Good and Evil, Nietzsche makes his famous philosophical argument for his theory of The Eternal Recurrence of the Same. In his argument Nietzsche claims eternality can really be reduced to a time span of about 70 years. His claim is that this is a period of time within "knowing" that appears to be eternal, or better, can be said to be eternal by a community of knowing people. His argument for this period of time standing for a period of time considered eternal is made from his evidence, the fact that a certain comet was visible to observers for about 70 years. Extending this conclusion to the science of geology it can be seen that the Earth's core changing the direction of it's spin every 70 years makes possible a moral science. The outlines of the scientific moral view from this discovery have not been written, yet.
Comments