I had mentioned in a previous post Flat Earth is a code to refer to 2 biblical realities. One, the Firmament, and two, the Ten Commandments. I have expanded the Flat Earth Model out of the Kingdom of Jesus to the Earthly Kingdoms. I theorize about Flat Earth not as it refers from the Heavenly Authority to the Kingdom of Jesus, only, but also how Earthly authorities direct thinking in the accomplishment of missions they have set. Necessarily I theorize according to Ends that are not only good and/or holy, but also evil, and of man or woman.
In further detailing my theory, in this post I am unpacking some codes which Flat Earth enthusiasts use to point people to express belief in the Firmament according to the Flat Earth expressions. I have picked some flat earth statements at random which I will 'unpack' in order to reveal their meaning as firmament, or ten commandments.
@100ItsLevel [cited correctly] Here is his post; "The 1st statement comes from a Twitter flat earth account called @100ItsLevel [cited correctly] Here is his post; "If gravity were truly real on Earth, any spinning spherical object(s) on Earth would develop their own gravity, but they don't. This is because gravity is a myth AND so is the spinning, speeding water globe Earth."[cited correctly.]If gravity were truly real on Earth, any spinning spherical object(s) on Earth would develop their own gravity, but they don't. This is because gravity is a myth AND so is the spinning, speeding water globe Earth."[cited correctly.] The first clues that this sentence is a flat earth statement come form "Michael's" calling into question the definition of gravity.@100ItsLevel [cited correctly] Here is his post;"If gravity were truly real on Earth, any spinning spherical object(s) on Earth would develop their own gravity, but they don't. This is because gravity is a myth AND so is the spinning, speeding water globe Earth."[cited correctly.]
The first clues that this sentence is a flat earth statement come form "Michael's" calling into question the definition of gravity. He tells his readers not to believe Newton, but to believe that gravity is not a law of scientific attraction but a myth. He does not tell us what gravity is beyond this, but goes further to, instead, tell us why it is not a law-that it is not applied in subsets and on Earth. His sensibility is that gravity should apply to lesser objects, on Earth, as it applies to greater objects, on Earth. Therefore, it is his first conclusion, since it does not then it is a myth. This supports his second conclusion, this Earth cannot be a globe. From these two conclusions he eliminates the other definitions of the Earth,, i.e. that it is a spinning globe, that it is a watery, globe, and that it is a spherical object. He leaves his reader to conclude that since the earth is not a sphere, it is flat.
In order to investigate Michael's statement we have to first see where his logic fails him. That is, his conclusion arguing from the lesser of things to the greater of things. In fact, this logic makes his conclusion, there is no gravity, illogical, because, as we know, what is ascribed of a greater object does not have to be ascribed of a lesser object, but vice versa. In fact, it is in this illogic that we find the first code word for his flat earth- gravity. In fact, Michael really says 'when I define gravity, I am not defining the Newtonian law of gravity. I am making a flat earth code word.' In order to understand, or appreciate what Michael means by "gravity" we need to proceed to the next step in his illogic. He says the definition of gravity begins with its definition of the subset, then extends to its definition of the greater object. Michael's gravity begins at ground level and extends to what is (not) spherical or global. In fact, this is exactly opposite how the law is defined. In fact, Michael sees gravity as attraction outward from the Earth's (flat) ground. From his conclusion, I propose his gravity is a code word for Firmament. Putting his statement together we are left with gravity is the attraction of objects on the ground to the firmament. In my opinion, this a very good statement of flat earth reality.
Комментарии